Learning Equilibria of Games via Payoff Queries

John Fearnley, Martin Gairing, Paul W. Goldberg, Rahul Savani; 16(Aug):1305−1344, 2015.

Abstract

A recent body of experimental literature has studied {\em empirical game-theoretical analysis}, in which we have partial knowledge of a game, consisting of observations of a subset of the pure-strategy profiles and their associated payoffs to players. The aim is to find an exact or approximate Nash equilibrium of the game, based on these observations. It is usually assumed that the strategy profiles may be chosen in an on-line manner by the algorithm. We study a corresponding computational learning model, and the query complexity of learning equilibria for various classes of games. We give basic results for exact equilibria of bimatrix and graphical games. We then study the query complexity of approximate equilibria in bimatrix games. Finally, we study the query complexity of exact equilibria in symmetric network congestion games. For directed acyclic networks, we can learn the cost functions (and hence compute an equilibrium) while querying just a small fraction of pure-strategy profiles. For the special case of parallel links, we have the stronger result that an equilibrium can be identified while only learning a small fraction of the cost values.

[abs][pdf][bib]




Home Page

Papers

Submissions

News

Editorial Board

Announcements

Proceedings

Open Source Software

Search

Statistics

Login

Contact Us



RSS Feed