## A Statistical Perspective on Randomized Sketching for Ordinary Least-Squares

** Garvesh Raskutti, Michael W. Mahoney**; 17(213):1−31, 2016.

### Abstract

We consider statistical as well as algorithmic aspects of solving large-scale least-squares (LS) problems using randomized sketching algorithms. For a LS problem with input data $(X, Y) \in \mathbb{R}^{n \times p} \times \mathbb{R}^n$, sketching algorithms use a sketching matrix

, $S\in\mathbb{R}^{r \times n}$, where $r \ll n$. Then, rather than solving the LS problem using the full data $(X,Y)$, sketching algorithms solve the LS problem using only the sketched data

$(SX, SY)$. Prior work has typically adopted an *algorithmic perspective*, in that it has made no statistical assumptions on the input $X$ and $Y$, and instead it has been assumed that the data $(X,Y)$ are fixed and worst-case (WC). Prior results show that, when using sketching matrices such as random projections and leverage-score sampling algorithms, with $p \lesssim r \ll n$, the WC error is the same as solving the original problem, up to a small constant. From a *statistical perspective*, we typically consider the mean-squared error performance of randomized sketching algorithms, when data $(X, Y)$ are generated according to a statistical linear model $Y = X \beta + \epsilon$, where $\epsilon$ is a noise process. In this paper, we provide a rigorous comparison of both perspectives leading to insights on how they differ. To do this, we first develop a framework for assessing, in a unified manner, algorithmic and statistical aspects of randomized sketching methods. We then consider the statistical prediction efficiency (PE) and the statistical residual efficiency (RE) of the sketched LS estimator; and we use our framework to provide upper bounds for several types of random projection and random sampling sketching algorithms. Among other results, we show that the RE can be upper bounded when $p \lesssim r \ll n$ while the PE typically requires the sample size $r$ to be substantially larger. Lower bounds developed in subsequent results show that our upper bounds on PE can not be improved. (A preliminary version of this paper appeared as Raskutti and Mahoney (2014, 2015).)

© JMLR 2016. (edit) |