Amos Beimel, Kobbi Nissim, Uri Stemmer.
Year: 2019, Volume: 20, Issue: 146, Pages: 1−33
Kasiviswanathan et al. (FOCS 2008) defined private learning as a combination of PAC learning and differential privacy. Informally, a private learner is applied to a collection of labeled individual information and outputs a hypothesis while preserving the privacy of each individual. Kasiviswanathan et al. left open the question of characterizing the sample complexity of private learners. We give a combinatorial characterization of the sample size sufficient and necessary to learn a class of concepts under pure differential privacy. This characterization is analogous to the well known characterization of the sample complexity of non-private learning in terms of the VC dimension of the concept class. We introduce the notion of probabilistic representation of a concept class, and our new complexity measure $RepDim$ corresponds to the size of the smallest probabilistic representation of the concept class. We show that any private learning algorithm for a concept class $C$ with sample complexity $m$ implies $RepDim(C)=O(m)$, and that there exists a private learning algorithm with sample complexity $m=O(RepDim(C))$. We further demonstrate that a similar characterization holds for the database size needed for computing a large class of optimization problems under pure differential privacy, and also for the well studied problem of private data release.